What Type of Art Makes Us Think or Feel
HOW ART MAKES Usa Experience AT Dwelling IN THE WORLD
See the article in its original context from
April 12, 1981
,
Section 2 , Page
1Buy Reprints
TimesMachine is an sectional do good for home commitment and digital subscribers.
About the Archive
This is a digitized version of an commodity from The Times'south impress archive, before the start of online publication in 1996. To preserve these articles every bit they originally appeared, The Times does not change, edit or update them.
Occasionally the digitization procedure introduces transcription errors or other problems; we are continuing to work to improve these archived versions.
Information technology is fundamental to the white magic of fine art that it does away with the nightmare of disorientation. Not simply does art tell united states who we are, simply it tells the states - or information technology used to tell us -where we are. And ''Where am I?'' is, after all, one of the about poignant of human being formulations. It speaks for an anxiety that is intense, recurrent and all but unbearable. Not to know where we are is torment, and not to have a sense of identify is a most sinister deprivation.
We await to painting, to the novel, to the movies and to the theater to relieve that deprivation. Verse is likewise a sovereign specific: with but a line or two past Elizabeth Bishop, for example, we can experience our fashion effectually Washington, and around Paris, and around the forests of New Brunswick equally they look from the window of a charabanc.
Music works less directly upon us, though the harmonic organization as it existed for several centuries can exist read as a sustained metaphor for losing and finding our fashion. When Robert Browning wrote about ''the C major of this life'' as an image of health, vigor and stability he knew what he was talking about. Just occasionally, too, music in the hands of a great eccentric can operate in terms of place, as happened when Charles Ives wrote ''Fundamental Park in the Nighttime.''
But what is being discussed here is the interlock of personality and environment. When that interlock has once been made vivid to united states - as it is in play after play by Ibsen, for instance - we are like strayed travelers to whom someone has handed a compass. Experiences of that kind and that order are available all over our city, at present as at every other time. Among movies now playing, iv in particular come to heed: ''Oblomov,'' ''Confidence,'' ''Breaker Morant'' and ''Atlantic Urban center.'' In the bookstores, nosotros can quickly verify that Elizabeth Bowen in her curt stories - merely republished by Knopf in a collected edition - has no equal when it comes to the evocation of London in the days when information technology was existence bombed. And for the sense of place as it in one case operated in the European theater, nosotros have a capital little show at the Cooper-Hewitt Museum of 19th-century German theater designs. Specially relevant, in that show, are the inventive and fatty-free designs with which the audience for Ferdinand Raimund's classic ''The Peasant as Millionaire'' is given just enough to go along the imagination alert. Nosotros know at in one case where we are. Nosotros recognize the corking Viennese townhouse sketched in a line or two -simply as we recognize the garden filled with obelisks equally 1 that could border the sloping terraces of the Dais. Even the view of stone faces near the roofline of the house stare down at us with a mischief that could only be Viennese.
In everyday life, ''Where am I?'' often gets a simple answer. ''On 36th Street, just eastward of 2nd Avenue,'' some kind person says, and with no more than ado the questioner heads for home. Simply if the answer is ''Shea Stadium, and it's out of season,'' he starts to wonder in what state of amnesia he got at that place. And if no respond comes at all - why, then he experiences a breakdown of orientation and feels himself the archetypal lost soul, condemned to wander forever.
And he'due south right. Not to be able to tell 1 matter from another - to have no sense of identify, in other words - is i of the nastiest things that can happen to us. ''Everywhere looked alike,'' the traveler says of a new state that he didn't intendance for. ''We couldn't discover our way around,'' he says of Tokyo, where street names and street numbers are rare. On brilliant, broad, faceless boulevards, as much equally in the ''night forest where the straight manner was lost'' that Dante evokes in the opening lines of the ''Inferno,'' we take trouble making out unless nosotros have a sense of place.
Information technology was ever so. What was it that Sigmund Freud most dreaded when he was taking his ax to the dark forest of human motivations? ''At that menses,'' he wrote afterwards, ''I was completely isolated, and in the network of issues and accumulation of difficulties I oft dreaded losing my bearings, and too my confidence.'' Bearings lost, and confidence lost: what could more than succinctly ascertain the ultimate in man disarray?
That is why we are trained to accept a sense of place. From the moment of nativity nosotros are kept busy, orienting and beingness oriented. It is in a frenzy of identification that we seize upon sure vital concepts: ''crib,'' ''lap,'' ''wagon,'' ''food,'' ''light,'' ''dark.'' ''Indoors'' and ''outdoors'' come later, followed by a huge appliance of codes cracked and conundrums happily resolved. Nosotros take information technology as the highest and virtually metaphorical of compliments when someone in subsequently life says to united states ''You certainly know your way around.''
Just we cannot get everywhere, let alone be everywhere at one and the aforementioned time. That is where art comes in. We rely upon fine art, whether we know information technology or not, to fortify our sense of place and keep information technology in good trim. The great novelists help enormously, for example, and fourth dimension lies lightly on their definitions. No amount of computerization in Wall Street tin can end Herman Melville, in ''Bartleby the Scrivener,'' from giving us a sense of that item place. Paris has changed very much indeed since Gustave Flaubert, and even since Marcel Proust, told united states what it is similar to visit friends for dinner. Just what they have to tell us is still our best orientation when we stride out of the elevator and press the bong.
What is truthful of this land, and of French republic, is truthful of other countries also. Much of Munich was destroyed in Globe War II, simply anyone who treads the parched grass in the Englische Garten at the dried end of summer will find an overwhelming rightness in the opening pages of Thomas Isle of mann'south ''Decease in Venice.'' If Anthony Trollope were back among u.s. today, he would hardly recognize either the England or the English of whom he wrote with such penetrating skill in the Palliser novels. But no affair where the tour double-decker takes the states, we are likely to find that Trollope has still, against all the odds, an incomparable sense of place.
Painting helps, too. Before photography, before the illustrated newspaper, before the movies and before television receiver, information technology was the role of painting to brand u.s.a. experience at home in the world. The more than attentively we look at the work of certain painters of the past, the more we wish that we could run across as they saw. What would nosotros non give to have, for case, Carpaccio'south eye for the detail of everyday life, and Constable's centre for the how and the why of everyday life in the land, and the young Corot'southward way of making us feel that paradise was wherever he happens to exist. As for the fall of light on an American croquet lawn, Winslow Homer got it once and for all.
Painting sharpened our sense of identify in a documentary style - in the Netherlands in the l7th century, for case -just information technology too did it in a coded, emblematic and securely emotional way. There was a delight in the vigor and the accuracy of man perceptions, but there was too a sense of regret, and nearly of terror, at the fidelity with which the waxing and waning of any given scene mirrors the waxing and waning of our human affairs. In how many of those stonecool Dutch church interiors is in that location non a memorial tablet fresh from the mason's yard! How often in the landscapes of Caspar David Friedrich in Germany, and of Fitz Hugh Lane in the United States, is there not a annotation of mourning, an unheard passing bell, in their perfectly calculated stillnesses! A sense of place may involve knowing not merely where we are, merely why nosotros are there.
It was too a part of the message of painting that places are made up of people, but equally much as they are made upward of architecture and landscape. Wilderness apart, there is something downhearted, something basically stunted and abnormal, well-nigh a place with nobody in it. (Even Robinson Crusoe, most self-sufficing of men, felt ameliorate when Homo Friday showed up.) George Stubbs - than whom no one was ever ameliorate at painting a horse - knew that a racecourse was cipher without its jockeys. Winslow Homer knew that a croquet lawn is zero without croquet players, and Edward Hopper knew that the disinherited look of a rundown rooming firm is all the more telling when the guest of the moment is done for the twenty-four hour period and stays dwelling house staring at the wall.
Amid the accredited masters of European 19th-century painting, none had a keener sense of place than Edgar Degas. Not fifty-fifty in the bully age of the French novel was there a writer who could more memorably prepare a human situation than Degas. He missed cipher, forgot nothing, and got everything to fit together. But he had to work at it. ''A skillful picture,'' he once said, ''requires as much planning as a crime.''
In this he was every bit far every bit possible from the nonchalance of the natural impressionist: the human being who could sit down pretty well anywhere and get straight downwardly to work. When Degas came to this state in 1872 to visit the branch of his family that had established itself in New Orleans, he was completely disoriented. Everything put him off - the glary light, the enigmatic folkways, the oddities of color, the non-European step of life and even the very profusion of new subjects that suggested themselves to him. It wasn't that he was ''against'' the Usa, information technology was just that he couldn't make caput or tail of it. He was in torment, and he couldn't expect to go home.
Yet it was this same famously difficult Edgar Degas who produced then and there 1 of the best pictures ever painted in America - and i of the virtually faithful to the spirit of place. ''Portraits in an Function - The Cotton Exchange in New Orleans'' has everything in it, not least the loose-jointed mode in which American men of business stand or sit while waiting to strike a bargain. We come to know that bookkeeper, upright at his ledgers. We know those windows, open up to the least puff of a Louisiana breeze. We know exactly the degree of professional conscience with which one man runs a scattering of cotton through his fingers while others stand at ease.
Degas in this painting got everything right, down to the title of the newspaper, the experience of the heavily woven trash handbasket and the stiff white cuffs of the men whose status entitled them to take their coats off in the heat of the day. That is what is meant by the sense of place - allied, in Degas'south case, to a feeling for the matter that, when once done perfectly, demand non be done once again. And, of form, he never did do it again. After his six-week stay he went dorsum to Paris, having said the final word virtually that detail attribute of American life.
Yet painting in the l870's was already on the very edge of losing its historic office every bit the primary locus of our deepest feelings about the look of things. That function was being eaten into on every side - by mechanical engraving, by the mass-produced prototype, past the photo in all its forms, and eventually past the picture. Photography in particular seemed to have everything in its favor. Information technology was instantaneous (by the standards of the easel painter). You could do it anywhere. In its early days it had an element of surprise, and about of the supernatural, that painting had long lost. It didn't accept half a lifetime to learn, and it was a democratic fine art, 1 in which all began equally equals.
To a higher place all, people said, the camera did not lie. Born with a brevet of authenticity, it functioned every bit the original plain dealer in its negotiations with the visible world. ''Elevation that!,'' photography said to painting. Information technology was in photography, if anywhere, that the sense of place would henceforth detect its home. They were not altogether mistaken, either. Walker Evans, for i, could point his camera at a big-city stoop anywhere in the United States and come up with the quintessence of that place at that time. (He could wreak the same magic with a shop sign, by the way).
Every bit for the movies, they were predestined to see all and tell all. What medium could hope to compare with them when it came to telling us what we wanted to know almost a named place? And if the movies could exercise that in blackness and white, how much improve would they do it in color and on a gigantic screen?
These were colossal opportunities, beyond a dubiousness. Information technology was within the potential of photography - then people thought - to put painting out of business organisation, to make the printed word seem like a quaint survival, and to exert over our thoughts and feelings a power without precedent. Besides, how can nosotros lack a sense of place today when there is nigh no such thing as a part of the globe that cannot be brought upwards on a screen? When Frederic Edwin Church came back from painting the Andes, 100 and more years agone, he was making a contribution to knowledge as well as turning out a huge painting that everyone and his blood brother wanted to see. But now we have the Andes in the epitome-bank, along with simply about every other place in the gazetteer. Our every whim tin be satisfied, and our every appetite slaked. We need never lose our bearings, allow alone our confidence.
On one level, that is. On the level of literal acquaintance and documentary charting we have a degree of orientation that even our fathers did not dare to dream of. But on the level of imaginative recreation? That is another matter. The dandy paintings of the 20th century are not concerned with the spirit of place to any significant caste, even if we tin can learn a great deal almost the cultivations of the Nile valley from one or two small paintings by Paul Klee. The great music of the 20th century skirts the spirit of identify, likewise, even if there is in Bartok's ''Bluebeard'due south Castle'' a stupendous evocation of a wide, smiling mural that defies the horizon to bring information technology to an end.
With one or two glorious exceptions such as these, painting and music are non the domains in which the spirit of place has taken refuge from the computer. The neat trick, and the definitive one, would be for the spirit of identify to insinuate itself where - against all the forecasts - information technology has not fared too well: in the movies, higher up all. Was it non in the movies that our perceptions of place were to be reinforced, multiplied and enriched? Yeah, it was. Simply all too often the enriched perceptions in question turn out to be like enriched bread: spurious.
For seeing is not knowing, in this context, and where there is no imaginative re-cosmos we respond momentarily or not at all. Likewise, we like to exercise some of the work. When Viola in ''12th Night'' says ''What country, friends, is this?'' and the Captain answers ''This is Illyria, lady,'' Shakespeare doesn't take to describe Illyria, merely the very name sets our imaginations racing. Only when nosotros see film after film in which Berlin is the Wall, and Arab republic of egypt is the Sphinx, the Keen Pyramid and the Valley of the Kings, and London is a few well-kept house-fronts, we tune out. The people have our attention, more than or less, simply the places do not. No matter how achieved the cinematography, nosotros notice the place every bit we observe the landscape in a cigarette ad, and with about as much credence. We believe when nosotros are made to believe, in other words, and non otherwise.
What makes us believe is imaginative re-creation, on the one hand, and a readiness to let us do some of the piece of work, on the other. This particular capacity has made nonsense of nationalism by turning upwards in country after state throughout the history of the movies. At this moment Hungarians have it, in ''Confidence.'' Australians have it, in ''Breaker Morant.'' Russians have information technology, in ''Oblomov.'' In England it has lately nested primarily in series fabricated for television, but in ''Atlantic City'' a Frenchman, Louis Malle, has persuaded environment and man personality to work together equally only a true poet can. The spirit of identify is live and well in all these movies, but information technology is not brought to life in a literal, one-to-one manner. The directors in question know that diamonds are to be used sparingly, not strewn effectually similar jelly-beans.
That is why we do not forget the hunted Jewish woman, in ''Conviction,'' who sits solitary in a Budapest tearoom, surrounded past well-dressed people who would not hesitate to plough her in. That is why nosotros remember how the huge, steaming, providential mushroom pie turns up in the snow in ''Oblomov.'' That is what holds the states in the bandstand scene in ''Breaker Morant,'' when violence strikes from the veldt and the everyday life of a colonial town goes on merely as usual. A poet has washed the choosing, in every case, and trusted us to see the point.
It doesn't seem to matter, though in logic it might, that some of the places we most think from movies are not what they pretend to be. In ''Billow Morant,'' for case, the veldt is not the veldt, and Pretoria is not Pretoria, since the moving picture was made in Australia and non in Southward Africa. Lifelong readers of ''Oblomov'' will not quite believe in the great blue-and-white palace that appears to such stunning result at one moment. It'south beautiful, simply it isn't correct. Nor do we feel that Oblomov's apartment in the opening scenes of the movie is set, equally the novelist tells us, ''in 1 of those large houses which have as many inhabitants every bit a state town.'' But we accept the veldt as the veldt, and Pretoria every bit Pretoria, and the palace and the apartment every bit plausible, considering we are having too expert a fourth dimension to stop and debate. We feel, in fact, virtually these discrepancies the way van Gogh felt virtually what people called his distortions: that when the emotional affect is right, what is ''untrue'' can be truer than true.
And that is, subsequently all, what the spirit of identify is all most. Gifted people say ''This is Illyria, folks,'' and nosotros handclapping our hands and get forth with them.
Source: https://www.nytimes.com/1981/04/12/arts/how-art-makes-us-feel-at-home-in-the-world.html
Post a Comment for "What Type of Art Makes Us Think or Feel"